Anthony Ames, Fifty Paintings
a83
83 Grand Street
New York, New York 10013
Open through September 18
In case you missed its initial run, a83, a gallery/print studio/archive in Soho, has extended its late-summer exhibition of works by Atlanta-based architect Anthony Ames through September 18. The exhibition, which initially ran from July 9 to August 8, is a fantastical retrospective of Amesâs architectural media. It comprises 47 paintings (realized between 1985 and 2020), three prints (made in collaboration with John Nichols Printmakers in 1989), and one seven-piece porcelain set (fabricated in 1990). For the Ames enthusiasts, there are narrative easter eggs embedded within each work; for the architectural purists, there are plenty of winks at historical modernist references; and for the casual visitor, there is the aesthetic gratification of the au courant postmodern vibes.
Ames began painting in 1984, a year after he won the Architecture Leagueâs Emerging Voices award. His visual sensibility demonstrates a strong attachment to early-twentieth century modernism and love for the game of basketball. âArchitecture and basketball do ⌠have a commonality in that they are both about creating space,â he observed in the recent namesake book published last year by ORO Editions, which preceded this exhibition. Amesâs paintings oscillate somewhere between the formality of a still life, the dynamism of sculptural relief, and the juxtaposed delight of collage.
Ames reveals his methodology in the book version of Fifty Paintings: âInitially each panel is painted white. The surface is then inscribed in graphite ⌠as a line drawing. ⌠The paint is allowed to touch the lineâbarelyâbut not the paint of the adjacent area. ⌠Masking is prohibited.â With this kind of painterly precision and smoothness, I couldnât help but think, âNothing but net.â Scanning the gallery walls, the inoffensive color palette connects the various works across spaceâphysically in the galleryâand chronological time. The soft hues are the same paints Ames uses in his built works: Pratt & Lambert acrylic latex house paint. This chromatic systemization expands the architecture of Amesâs paintings to include his catalog of houses.
Varying in scale and shapeâwith the largest panel being a 48-inch square panel and the smallest an idealized 10-inch squareâAmes signs and dates each painting with Le Corbusierâlike stenciled letters along the edge. Instead of cloth canvas, Ames opts for wood panelsâa nod to standardized building materials. Nearly all the paintings measure 2 inches in depth, reinforcing them as objects. Ames declares: âPerhaps this is a reaction to the ephemeral nature of the âcyber-space,â virtual reality image.â Funnily enough, I learned of Amesâs architectural work a few years ago through the homogenized square format of Instagram. Yet unlike the quick consumption of scrolling feeds, standing before each painting demands close attention to the constructed mise-en-scĂŠne. (The James Rosenquistâesque âcornice-to-bowl-of-spaghettiâ is one of my favorite moments). The generosity of spaces and interesting thingsâtrees, houses, columns, chairs, rugs, books, guitars, cars, planes, pitchers, hoops, and so onâwithin a given composition reveals a thoughtfulness in the placement of each point, line, and object.
The larger works are placed in the front room, including the dimensional White Compositions that pop off the panels with spatial complexities rendered simply in a monochromatic wash. 25 petite paintings measure at 10-inches square and wrap the back room at eye-level, like the ribbon windows featured in many of the pieces. Theyâre an immersive experience. The Swid Powellâproduced glazed porcelain set of generically specific dinnerware sits on the center of the back wallâthey are key objects in translating seemingly obscure yet familiar shapes in the paintings.
Itâs not a reach to say that Amesâs architectural works read as inside-baseballâor basketball, in this case. The description text in the gallery hand-out, as well as Andrea Simitchâs introduction in the book, traces the conceptual linage of Amesâs paintings back to the rigid dialog of Colin Rowe and Robert Slutzkyâs 1955 essay âTransparencyâ and GyĂśrgy Kepesâs 1944 publication, Language of Vision. And, sure, âliteral and phenomenalâ can categorize (or post-rationalize) such work, but this makes the work feel as if it were contrived or pedantic to the voices (or audience) currently being pushed out of the disciplinary picture in recent years.
The paintings undoubtedly communicate the âhigh,â capital-A Architecture of modernism, particularly that of media- and brand-savvy figures like Corb, but they also acknowledge figures like Michael Jordan as equally influential to Ames. The latter provides a crucial catalyst for the shifting zeitgeist in architecture discourse today: uncovering alternative histories and new architectural heroes. (Architecture is more of a team sport these daysâmuch like Phil Jacksonâs underdog transformation of Michael Jordan and the Chicago Bulls in the 1990s.) Sure, the works reference Corbâs Villa Savoye and Villa Stein, but a larger pair of scenes also reference Bo Diddleyâs Twang Machine and the Les Paul of rockers who followed in his footsteps. Within each painstakingly technical workâbetween the hoops and guitars, the villas and vasesâIâm reminded of Allen Iversonâs 2002 press conference in which he drops the word âpracticeâ 22 times to emphasize that even greatness has its vulnerabilities.
My hope is that viewers take in the exhibition with the same playful spirit that Ames presents at the end of his book: A simple sketch depicts Nikeâs dunking Jumpman in motion, with round âCorb glassesâ flying off. âWhether Corb actually âhad gameâ will forever remain speculation,â Ames quipped. Iâd like to imagine the sketch communicates something more like Jumpman as Modulor, or Jordan as Architect. Either way, Iâm grateful to a83 for going into overtime with Fifty Paintings.
Courtney Coffman is a writer and an editor based in Princeton, New Jersey.