When Architecture Becomes a Tool of Control
Can Buildings Impose a Culture That Doesn’t Belong?
While reading a report about an urban development project in Eastern Europe, one comment struck me: We live in a city we no longer recognize. Architectural modernity exposes us to structures that can be raw, honest representations of a new era, but it can also be a tool that erases, rather than enhances, a place.
All around the world, rapid urban development is often equated with progress through architectural modernity. But at what cost? Earthen homes are demolished, century-old trees are uprooted, and streets once full of local character are replaced by lifeless corridors with no trace of the people who once gave them meaning.
A Modern Facade… or a Mask of Power?
What might appear as a symbol of progress can, in reality, serve another purpose. When governments or private developers impose architectural styles imported from elsewhere—disconnected from the local context—they’re not just building structures, they’re rewriting identity in the name of architectural modernity.
Across Africa, Eastern Europe, and even parts of China, we’ve seen modern urban renewal projects implemented with a unified style that completely erases the site’s original character in pursuit of architectural modernity.
| Country | Project Example | Local Reaction |
|---|---|---|
| Nigeria | Modern housing in a traditional village | This place no longer reflects us. |
| China | Redevelopment of historic villages | We’ve lost details that lived for centuries. |
| Bulgaria | High-rise towers replace old homes | The soul of the city has vanished. |
Architectural Whitewashing: Erasing Identity with Polished Surfaces
Just as money laundering hides the source of illicit wealth, a term has surfaced in architectural circles—Architectural Whitewashing—describing the attempt to erase or sanitize a place’s cultural memory by covering it in a slick, modern skin.
In one European city, an entire neighborhood was rebuilt to imitate French classical architecture. But this makeover replaced actual 18th-century homes that once belonged to generations of local farmers. It looked good on paper—but no one could relate to it anymore.
Who Decides What Progress Looks Like?
Modernity isn’t inherently oppressive. But when it’s enforced without context or consent, it becomes a silent kind of domination. The real challenge lies in reimagining progress through the lens of place, not despite it. True architectural development is born from engaging with what exists, not erasing it for architectural modernity.
| Local Building Element | Fate in Modern Projects |
|---|---|
| Locally sourced timber | Replaced with synthetic panels |
| Inner courtyards | Removed in favor of closed interiors |
| Passive ventilation | Replaced by full HVAC systems |
| Traditional colour palettes | Replaced with dull, grey tones |
Not a Battle of Form—But of Meaning
When ancestral homes are replaced with lifeless concrete blocks, we don’t just lose buildings—we lose memory, community rhythms, and a language of living through architectural modernity. Cities begin to resemble one another, stripped of the details that once made them unique.
Yet, it is possible to design modern buildings that respect roots by carefully balancing architectural modernity with historical context. This isn’t about nostalgia or going backward—it’s about listening to a place deeply enough to let its voice shape the future.
Conclusion
Architecture is more than structures. It’s memory, identity, and belonging. When it is used to impose, rather than represent, it becomes a silent form of control—one that conceals more than it reveals.
✦ ArchUp Editorial Insight
This article offers a thoughtful critique of how modern architecture, oftentimes influenced by architectural modernity, can be employed to impose a cultural narrative disconnected from its surroundings. The visual elements highlight a dominance of glass façades and rigid geometry that override traditional urban fabrics, replacing local materials and artisanal detail with industrial finishes. While the composition is visually coherent and invites reflection, it lacks a thorough discussion on functional and social dynamics of such developments. Do these projects truly serve their communities, or do they merely replicate a homogenized global aesthetic? Nevertheless, the article succeeds in opening a necessary dialogue on redefining architectural progress, lending it significant analytical relevance.
Explore the Latest Architecture Exhibitions & Conferences
ArchUp offers daily updates on top global architectural exhibitions, design conferences, and professional art and design forums.
Follow key architecture competitions, check official results, and stay informed through the latest architectural news worldwide.
ArchUp is your encyclopaedic hub for discovering events and design-driven opportunities across the globe.
