Architect Proposes Gothic-Futurist Drone Stations for Mountain Regions
Ukrainian architect Alina Sanina has unveiled a conceptual design for high-altitude drone stations aimed at supporting eco-tourism and mountain rescue operations. Dubbed Lynx, the idea envisions integrating drones with architectural structures in remote mountainous areas, creating a new typology of architecture that blends technology and landscape.
Conceptual Vision
The Lynx concept is designed for regions with limited mobility, including the Carpathians, Alps, and Pyrenees. Sanina proposes a network of autonomous outposts that function as hubs for drone operations while remaining visible and accessible to the public.
Each station would serve as a center for drone storage, charging, maintenance, and flight coordination. Depending on location, the circular structures could also host a planetarium, research spaces, viewing terraces, a media library, or compact accommodation. The idea frames these stations as architectural landmarks rather than purely functional installations.
Function and Technology
Service drones could deliver essentials such as water, food, and medical supplies to hikers, while passenger drones might provide aerial sightseeing tours. Visitors would interact with the system through a dedicated smartphone app offering route information, weather updates, and an integrated SOS feature.
According to Sanina, this approach suggests a “new layer of mountain infrastructure—for both people and drones.”
Gothic-Futurist Aesthetics
Lynx’s design combines lightweight glass with monolithic concrete. The structure’s concentric rings echo historic defensive fortifications, while serrated walls mirror the surrounding ridgelines.
The composite building material transitions from solid concrete at the base to a higher proportion of translucent glass toward the top. Microscopic glass particles create a crystalline sheen that changes with sunlight and cloud cover. The façade could incorporate photovoltaic cells, generating energy directly from sunlight and enabling autonomous operation in remote areas.
Additional solar panels on the roof would power the internal systems and charge the drones. Expansive glass openings aim to blur the boundary between interior and exterior, providing panoramic views while maintaining functionality.
Addressing Mountain Challenges
Mountain tourism carries inherent risks. In 2024, authorities conducted nearly 500 rescue operations in the Ukrainian Carpathians alone.Sudden weather changes, communication breakdowns, and difficult terrain make traditional rescue operations resource-intensive.
Drones can cover large areas quickly, detect thermal signatures, deliver supplies, and transmit instructions, providing a faster and safer alternative. Sanina emphasizes that Lynx positions drones as part of a broader humanitarian and ecological system rather than strictly utilitarian tools.
Future Implications
The proposed stations aim to merge innovation with nature, creating mountain environments that are safer, more accessible, and adaptable.By combining technology with landscape-driven design, Lynx could help architects transform services in remote mountain areas.
Sanina highlights Ukraine’s rapid advancements in autonomous aerial systems and suggests the timing is right to explore how drones can enhance human well-being in challenging environments.
deployment, operational sequencing, and environmental monitoring. The “Lynx” drone station is the logical outcome of mobility constraints + regulatory rigidity + operational risk optimization.
✦ ArchUp Editorial Insight
Layer 1 – Non-Architectural Data
High-altitude mountain regions create mobility constraints. Rescue operations rely on rapid response; logistics involve small, transportable payloads. Eco-tourism introduces seasonal surges, with hikers dependent on real-time information. Labor is specialized, with trained operators for aerial vehicles. Financing favors low-capital interventions capable of autonomous operation.
Layer 2 – Decision Frameworks
Policies prioritize safety and environmental impact. Regulations favor modular, adaptable systems to limit physical footprint. Operational risk drives redundancy and remote monitoring. Institutional approvals favor automated, low-maintenance solutions. Insurance logic penalizes delayed response times and inaccessible infrastructure.
Layer 3 – Architectural Outcome
The resulting structure exhibits concentric, self-contained modules for storage, operations, and observation. Massing adapts to terrain and visibility requirements. Façade systems integrate energy generation and transparency. Spatial layouts reflect rapid deployment, operational sequencing, and environmental monitoring. The “Lynx” drone station is the logical outcome of mobility constraints + regulatory rigidity + operational risk optimization.