Rome Rain Rooms 2026

Rome Rain Rooms 2026

Home » Competitions » Rome Rain Rooms 2026

Competition Brief

Purpose

The Rome Rain Rooms 2026 competition is a call for urban rainwater harvesting designs from designers, architects, and creative society. The sustainability, social engagement, and sensory experience should integrate in the models. The concept must be non-invasive, easy to move, and considerate to the city, and involve the rain’s visual and auditory aspects.

Intent

The challenge is to find new inventions that can combine urban functionality with nature’s power. The designers are expected to come up with concepts that will beautify public places and at the same time help people realize how important the nature and sustainable lifestyle are.

Jury

Manuela De Micheli – Studio Transit – Italy
Her role at Studio Transit is that of a partner and artistic director. After being born in Rome in 1968, she attended La Sapienza University from where she graduated. She has managed architectural efforts of different magnitudes and is now responsible for the creative guidance of Studio Transit.

Ivan Juarez – x-studio | Ivan Juarez – Finland
Ivan Juarez is the founder of the x-studio and the Nordscape Lab in Iceland. He possesses a Ph.D. in Fine Arts and an M.Sc. in Landscape Architecture. His artistic activity involves the trichotomy of architecture, art and nature, including but not limited to installations, participatory projects, and body-scaled architectures.

Rodolfo Morandi – AACM – Italy
Rodolfo Morandi, co-founder of the Italian architectural office AACM, which has locations in both Padua and Milan, works mostly in the fields of residential, commercial, and public architecture. He was one of the contributors to Renzo Piano’s G124 initiative and his architectural practice is characterized by the creation of spaces that are contextual, light-sensitive, and socially engaged.

Patrizia Pisaniello – MICROSCAPE Architecture Urban Design AA – Italy
A member of the founding team at MICROSCAPE in Lucca, Italy. The domain of her expertise includes architecture, urban and landscape research, photography, writing, and teaching. MICROSCAPE has been awarded internationally and has had its works exhibited broadly.

Lieven Poutsma – Observatorium – Netherlands
At Observatorium, he is a partner with the main area of achieving public art and placemaking. He has a degree in Interior Architecture from the Royal Academy of Art, The Hague. He deals with the planning of squares, parks, modular constructions, and transformations of urban areas.

DaeWha Kang – DaeWha Kang Design – United Kingdom
DaeWha Kang is the founder of DaeWha Kang Design. Before that, he was part of Zaha Hadid Architects. He has the skills in the areas of parametric design, digital fabrication, and the adaptive reuse of and working on heritage projects. His works include the Black Gold Museum (Riyadh) and St Andrew Holborn regeneration (London).

Andrea Tabocchini – Andrea Tabocchini Architecture – Italy
Architectural studio in Ancona with an award-winning founder. Collaboration with OMA, Kengo Kuma, and RCR Arquitectes. Involved in projects such as housing, business premises, urban planing, exhibitions, and museums. Listed among the best young talents in Europe and appeared in Fortune Italia.

Fees

Entry TypeFee
Standard Registration75–125 €

Prizes

CategoryDetails
First Place5,000 €
Second Place2,500 €
Third Place1,000 €
Buildner Student Award1,000 €
Buildner Sustainability Award500 €
Certificates of Recognition6 participations

Timeline

StageDate
Final Registration28 May 2026
Submission Deadline29 June 2026 (23:59 London Time)
Winners Announcement15 September 2026

✦ ArchUp Competition Review

The Rome Rain Rooms 2026 competition is an open call for entries, which includes the design of rain rooms, the collection and reuse of rainwater in urban contexts, apart from the main theme of sustainability, sensory experience, and social engagement. The panel of judges is made up of seven world-famous architects who are experts in urban design, landscape, installation, and participatory projects, thus assuring a reliable and diversified evaluative viewpoint. The entry fees which vary from 75 to 125 € according to the time of registration, are not high, however, they might limit the participation of students or independent designers from the lower-income areas. The prize money is divided into several categories like cash awards, student and sustainability recognition, and certificates, thus giving the winners not only the financial gain but also the other kinds of encouragement that the competition brings along. The competition permits reversible designs and flexible urban sites which could lead to the exploration of new ideas and the creative adaptation of existing ones, even though it makes the evaluation process complicated due to the different quality of proposals. Definitely, the competition is a perfect mix of eco-friendly innovation, social interaction, and urban integration, though the practical advantages for the participants are mostly limited to the aspects of visibility and the probability of implementation of the winning designs.

Critical Analysis

Purpose and Intent

The competition promotes the use of rainwater as a functional and social element of urban spaces. By demanding reversible and lightweight designs, the participants are led to practical, ecological, and interactive solutions through the brief.

Jury

The jury consists of seven architects of international stature with different skills in the areas of urban design, landscape, installation, and participatory projects. The jury ensures a wide evaluative view on the sustainability, creativity, and urban integration aspects.

Fees and Accessibility

Entry fees are reasonable and set in phases, which might motivate early signing up. On the other hand, costs can be a factor that limits the participation of some students or freelancers.

Prizes

The prize strategy includes not only monetary awards but also the recognition of students, the acknowledgement of sustainability, and certificates, thus making the financial gain not the only motive for participation.

Competition Flexibility

Reversible designs and urban site variability give rise to experimental creativity and various approaches. Participants have the opportunity to modify their concepts for different locations in Rome.

Strengths and Weaknesses

The strengths consist of the incorporation of environmental sustainability, sensual experience, and urban interaction. A major challenge is to find the right balance between the complexity of the design and its feasibility and to evaluate the varying proposals through the jury’s multidisciplinary lens.

Explore the Latest Architecture Exhibitions & Conferences

ArchUp offers daily updates on top global architectural exhibitionsdesign conferences, and professional art and design forums.
Follow key architecture competitions, check official results, and stay informed through the latest architectural news worldwide.
ArchUp is your encyclopedic hub for discovering events and design-driven opportunities across the globe.

Registration Deadline

  

Brought to you by the ArchUp Editorial Team

Inspiration starts here. Dive deeper into ArchitectureInterior DesignResearchCitiesDesign, and cutting-edge Projects on ArchUp

Further Reading from ArchUp

  • Architecture for Fashion

    The course “Architecture for Fashion” from YACademy has been updated. Meet and work with David Chipperfield Architects, SANAA, Herzog & de Meuron, Duccio Grassi Architects, and Claudio Silvestrin Architects: 3 scholarships that fully cover the cost of enrollment and allow…

  • Mark Baines Architectural Illustration Competition

    Architecture Competition: Mark Baines Architectural Illustration Competition The Alexander Thomson Society is delighted to announce the ‘Remembering Mark Baines’ Biennial Architectural Illustration Competition. The late Mark Baines was a founding member and Chair of the Society, an architect, and teacher…

  • THE FACE OF RENOVATION

    The Face of Renovation is an open international contest for development of architectural solution concepts of buildings under the program of housing stock renovation in Moscow. We invite Russian and international teams of architects with relevant experience in volumetric-spatial design….

  • Call for Entries – 25th Japan Media Arts Festival

    Architecture Competition: Call for Entries – 25th Japan Media Arts Festival The Japan Media Arts Festival Executive Committee is currently tolerating sections for the 25th Japan Media Arts Festival. All craftsmen all throughout the planet, without qualification as to proficient,…

  • AI x Biomimicry: Competition + Course

    Submitted by WA Contents Spain Architecture News – Jul 21, 2023 – 14:30   678 views Never Enough Architecture (NEA) is launching a new initiative that joins education and contests. The initiative combines traditional architecture competitions with free expert-led courses, giving participants a comprehensive understanding of the contests’ central topics.For their first competition + course

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

One Comment

  1. ArchUp Editorial Management

    Jury Committee Assessment:

    · No information has been provided about the members of the jury committee.
    · No details are available regarding their expertise or professional backgrounds.
    · A complete lack of transparency regarding the evaluation process.

    Analysis of the Competition’s Nature:

    · Knowledge Value:
    · A specialized topic intersecting architecture and water sustainability.
    · Focus on innovative solutions for climate challenges in historical cities.
    · Clear and technical design criteria.
    · Organizational Aspects:
    · Variable participation fees based on stage.
    · Substantial monetary prizes (€5,000 for first prize).
    · Detailed, long-term schedule.

    Final Assessment:

    · Detailed information about the jury committee and their expertise must be added.
    · The fee values for each stage must be specified with precision.
    · It is recommended to verify the organizing body and its track record.
    · The topic is excellent for ArchUp and aligns with architecture and sustainability specializations.
    · The information gap regarding the jury must be addressed before publication.