A House for Sigurd Lewerentz

Competition Brief

Purpose

The competition is open to architects and designers to envision a conceptual “house” that would be the finished product of Sigurd Lewerentz’s spirit and architectural philosophy. The challenge requires to contemplate about life, death, memory, introspection, and poetic spatial experience themes which are characterized by an atmosphere, meaning, and existential depth instead of being limited by a fixed program or function.

Intent

The competition is inviting participants to submit their works in any format and scale. The “house” can be literal, abstract, mystical, symbolic, or experimental. The main aim is to use architecture as a medium of reflection and emotion, thus, honoring Lewerentz’s subtle, contemplative approach and not just producing a traditional dwelling design.

Jury

No public list of jury or judges is provided.

Prizes

Fees

Participation is free

Timeline

✦ ArchUp Competition Review

The competition remains anonymous, yet it entices architects and designers to visualize a “house” referring to Sigurd Lewerentz’s architectural conviction. No public list of jury members is presented, thus lessening the transparency and making the criteria for assessment and possible biases indistinct. The broad brief accepts any format or scale for submissions, thereby encouraging designers to think deeply, poetically, and symbolically rather than through conventional programmatic design. Participation does not cost anything, which is a point of great accessibility, yet the absence of structured support and the necessity for strong conceptual or graphic execution might give an edge to the more experienced designers. The lack of defined criteria and jury supervision brings in subjectivity, and the wide interpretive latitude could end up with the production of speculative works that have no architectural coherence. The chosen works are exhibited or published online but no financial reward is given, and the competition mainly acts as an exercise in design thinking, conceptual exploration, and portfolio development. Participants are the ones who benefit the most if they are prepared for the introspective and abstract design challenges; those with the practical or buildable solutions may find little value.

Critical Analysis

Conceptual Depth vs Vague Program

The open and symbolic brief grants a very broad range of interpretation to the designers. As a result, it might come up with a very beautiful but also rather impractical proposal that would create an emotional connection rather than a functional one. On the other hand, a very abstract submission might be a consequence of the artist’s lack of a clear program and constraints, which would result in an abstract piece of art with no clear spatial or architectural coherence. Besides, the judges may think that the entries produced are merely speculative art and not architecture because there were no guidelines given in terms of scale, function, or site.

Lack of Jury Transparency

The reason for that is that no jury is named publicly and thus the participants have no idea who will evaluate their work and what their criteria and biases might be. Such an opacity greatly weakens accountability and makes the whole selection process pretty much a gamble. The designers are unable to predict which of the three aspects, namely, conceptual depth, visual aesthetics, or formal execution, will be prioritized.

Accessibility and Equity

The free entry policy is the main cause of the low barrier for participation and therefore, it encourages a submission of works from a very broad range of participants all over the world. However, the open format and the demand for strong conceptual or poetic work might favor the experienced designers who have excellent graphic or theoretical skills, thereby disadvantaging the less resource-equipped participants.

Challenge of Evaluation Across Diverse Formats

On the one hand, since the competition allows any format, size, or type of work, the evaluation process of submissions gets to be very complicated. On the other hand, this great variety of media, scale, and ambition makes it extremely difficult to draw an equitable comparison among them. In the absence of unified criteria or constraints, the evaluation may be heavily influenced by personal taste, rather than a consistent standard.

Value of Reflection over Utility

The contest puts a spotlight on introspection, symbolism, and existential themes. This not only coincides with Lewerentz’s legacy but also invites a discussion about non-utilitarian architecture. The competition caters to a specific group: those who see architecture as poetry, memory, or philosophical expression. All the rest still can benefit from a non-direct distance to usable results if not practical or buildable solutions from the competition.

Conclusion

A House for Sigurd Lewerentz invites imaginings, a rare space for architectural speculation, poetic reflection, and conceptual exploration. The invitation to reimagine “house” beyond function and program opens possibilities for deep, introspective design thinking.

At the same time, the absence of jury transparency, lack of defined criteria, and open-ended format introduce uncertainty in evaluation and equity. Designers who enter must be prepared for subjective judgment and must balance conceptual depth with clarity of presentation to stand a chance.

For those drawn to architecture as art and philosophical expression, this competition may be a valuable opportunity. For those seeking functional or pragmatic design challenges, its value remains limited.

Explore the Latest Architecture Exhibitions & Conferences

ArchUp offers daily updates on top global architectural exhibitions, design conferences, and professional art and design forums.
Follow key architecture competitions, check official results, and stay informed through the latest architectural news worldwide.
ArchUp is your encyclopedic hub for discovering events and design-driven opportunities across the globe.

Registration Deadline

Brought to you by the ArchUp Editorial Team

Inspiration starts here. Dive deeper into Architecture, Interior Design, Research, Cities, Design, and cutting-edge Projects on ArchUp