Home » Competitions » House of Poetry

House of Poetry

House of Poetry competition visual showing a red book above a hill town and green landscape
Official promotional visual for House of Poetry, organised by YAC with the Municipality of Marradi. Courtesy of the organiser; rights remain with the respective owners.

Competition Brief

House of Poetry is an international ideas competition organised by Young Architects Competitions (YAC) with the Municipality of Marradi, Italy. It seeks proposals to adapt Dino Campana’s house into a museum and cultural facility, combining exhibition spaces, literary research, community activities and improved access. The cash prize fund is €15,000. Registration closes on 13 December 2026; submissions close at noon GMT on 16 December 2026.

Intent and Design Scope

The architectural task is to make a historic domestic building work as a public cultural place. Proposals must address three connected areas: the existing house, its gardens and a new connection to the street. Within the house, the brief restricts intervention to interior works and prohibits demolition of structural elements. It permits changes to non-structural partitions and calls for reversible exhibition design.

The ground floor accommodates exhibition and multipurpose/archive spaces; the first floor houses the Centro Studi Campaniani and the Marradi Cultura – Dino Campana Foundation; the second floor and attic contain the house-museum. The garden programme includes a lightweight, reconfigurable 16 m² pavilion for reception, ticketing, a bookshop and small events. An elevated connection must link the upper garden to the street access identified in the supplied drawings. Accessibility, feasibility and respect for the historic fabric are explicit requirements.

Purpose and Eligibility

The municipality presents the project as cultural regeneration tied to Campana’s legacy. A real site and a municipal partner give the brief a defined context, but the reviewed documents do not promise a construction commission to the winner. Participants should distinguish the ideas award from a subsequent appointment or funded building programme.

Individuals and teams may enter, with no maximum team size and no mandatory professional registration. The rules contain an age inconsistency: clause 2.5 requires at least one member aged 18–35, while clause 3.1(e) refers to a member younger than 35, including for solo entries. Anyone relying on a participant aged exactly 35 should obtain written clarification before paying. Work or family relationships with jurors are grounds for exclusion. One fee covers one proposal; additional proposals require further fees.

Submission Requirements

MaterialRequired format and content
A1 presentation boardOne PDF, 841 × 594 mm, portrait or landscape, maximum 10 MB. Include the concept, drawings and three-dimensional views. Filename: A1_teamname_HP.pdf.
A3 albumOne landscape PDF, 420 × 297 mm, up to seven pages, maximum 10 MB. Include a general plan at 1:250, relevant plans at 1:100 and at least one relevant section at 1:100. Filename: A3_teamname_HP.pdf.
Cover imageOne JPG or PNG, 1920 × 1080 pixels. The brief illustrates the filename as cover_teamname_HP.jpg.

Upload through the organiser’s team account. Text must be concise and in English. Neither personal names nor the team name may appear inside the submitted materials; the team name belongs only in the filenames. Entries must remain unpublished until results are announced. Clause 4.5 permits AI as an inspiration tool but excludes proposals that are merely algorithmic outputs: submissions must demonstrate architectural design through drawings. Site photographs and 2D/3D files are supplied by the organiser.

Organiser and Jury

YAC’s own history dates its establishment to 8 March 2013, approximately 13 years before this call, and reports more than 50 competitions. These are organiser-reported credentials, not an independent audit of every previous competition.

JurorPublished affiliation
Massimiliano FuksasStudio Fuksas
Valerie MulvinMcCullough Mulvin Architects
Tommaso TribertiMunicipality of Marradi
Vincenzo LatinaVincenzo Latina Architetti
Paolo ZermaniStudio di Architettura Zermani Associati
Valentina GianiculiMunicipality of Marradi
Walter ScarpiCentro Studi Campaniani
Riccardo NenciniMarradi Cultura – Dino Campana Foundation
Massimo IsolaMunicipality of Faenza
Lapo NaldoniMario Cucinella Architects

The panel combines architectural practice with municipal and literary institutions relevant to the building’s future use. Participants must direct questions to YAC at yac@yac-ltd.com and must not contact jurors about the competition.

Registration Fees

Registration periodBase fee per teamIncluding stated 22% VAT
21 September – 18 October 2026€65€79.30
19 October – 15 November 2026€85€103.70
16 November – 13 December 2026€115€140.30

Each registration window closes at 23:59 GMT. The totals above apply the VAT rate specified by the organiser. Registration tier does not change the submission deadline.

Prizes and Rewards

AwardPublished amount / recognition
First prize€8,000
Second prize€4,000
Third prize€2,000
Two Gold Mentions€500 each
Ten honourable mentionsNon-cash recognition
Thirty finalistsPublication on the organiser’s website

The rules state that prize amounts include taxes and bank commissions. Payment follows eligibility and identity checks and acceptance of the required rights-transfer declarations; the listed awards should therefore not be presented as guaranteed net payments.

Key Dates

MilestoneOfficial deadline
Early registration closes18 October 2026, 23:59 GMT
Standard registration closes15 November 2026, 23:59 GMT
Final registration closes13 December 2026, 23:59 GMT
Submission deadline16 December 2026, 12:00 noon GMT
Jury convenes21 December 2026, according to the competition webpage
Results announced25 January 2027

The brief specifies GMT, equivalent to UTC for these timestamps. The submission deadline is midday, not midnight.

✦ ArchUp Competition Review

The brief’s architectural value lies in its constraints: inserting public access and cultural uses into a small historic house without treating the existing structure as disposable. The garden pavilion and elevated link make the proposal a circulation and landscape problem as well as an exhibition exercise. A convincing entry needs to resolve those relationships; an atmospheric museum image alone would leave the central task unanswered.

The named jury offers relevant architectural and local cultural perspectives. Municipal and foundation representatives can contribute knowledge of future use, while the architectural members can assess spatial and conservation decisions. Their presence supports the relevance of the panel, but does not by itself establish a funded route to construction or guarantee the quality of the judging process.

The most consequential participant issue is the rights provision. Clause 4.1 grants publication and distribution rights over submitted material. Clause 4.2 goes substantially further for cash-prize projects, describing acquisition of available intellectual and industrial rights and extensive powers to use, realise, adapt and transfer the work. It also uses both non-exclusive and exclusive language. That wording merits written clarification from the organiser; entrants should not assume they retain unrestricted commercial control. Prize payment is tied to acceptance of rights-transfer declarations.

ArchUp considers this a substantive adaptive-reuse design opportunity with a disclosed jury and programme, alongside terms that require careful consideration. The age inconsistency, full VAT-inclusive fee, rights scope and absence of a promised winner’s commission should all be weighed before committing design time. Organiser longevity and recognisable names do not remove those questions.

Final Thoughts

This call is best suited to participants interested in conservation, exhibition design and public accessibility who are comfortable entering an ideas competition on the published terms. Resolve the age and rights questions before registration, and allow time for all three submission files.

Registration Deadline

The countdown marks registration closure. Submit all files by 16 December 2026 at 12:00 noon GMT / UTC.

Prepared by ArchUp Radar under the ArchUp competition transparency policy. The organiser’s page and English competition brief were checked on 28 September 2026. Check the organiser’s current rules and FAQ before payment and submission.

Further Reading From ArchUp

  • International Health & Wellness Awards

    TITAN Health Awards: International Health & Wellness Awards is now open for entries! TITAN Health Awards: International Health & Wellness Awards: The TITAN Health Awards has been recently opened for entries inviting submittions from all advertisers, marketers, designers, service providers, manufacturers and all parties involved in the healthcare and wellness industry worldwide. design advertising brand

  • Design Competition of International Islands and the Future Residence

    The best buildings are like this. We are deep in it, but we don’t know where nature ends and art begins.— Yutang LinFishing villages were born from the inhabitation of human beings. In the course of shaping and adapting to the nature, the relationship of humans and nature developed and reached a kind of dynamic

  • L+A+N+D (Landscape + Art + Nature + Design)

    Overview L+A+N+D (Landscape + Art + Nature + Design) celebrates innovative design concepts for immersive outdoor installations on a grand…

  • Center for Architecture Lab

    The Center for Architecture Lab 2026 redefines how architecture engages with democracy, activism, and public space. Designed as a multi-month,…

  • Symbiocene: Architecture for a Biodiverse Future 2026

    Competition Brief Archiol Competitions invites architects, designers, students, artists, and visionaries to explore a future where architecture actively supports biodiversity….

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *